Stephen King’s many novels have been replicated almost as often in TV and film. Some have been lasting triumphs (hello The Shining), others most certainly haven’t. One that fell firmly into the latter was a 2017 adaptation of his cross-genre epic The Dark Tower. That movie, which starred Idris Elba and Matthew McConaughey, compressed 8 books-worth of material into a flimsy 90-minute studio job.
Clearly then, the opportunity to make a definitive screen-version of the series remains open, and there’s no shortage of would-be suitors. In a recent interview with Syfy, horror filmmaker Mike Flanagan voiced his desire to make a Dark Tower adaptation, describing it as the “Holy Grail”:
“The Dark Tower is forever going to be the story I wish I could tell. That would be the Holy Grail. I mean, talk about an adaptation challenge… So many very talented people have poured so much time and heart and soul and blood, sweat and tears trying to crack that.”
Flanagan has already directed one King project, applying his talents to last year’s Doctor Sleep, so it’s not inconceivable then that he’d be in a position to helm another. However, as he acknowledges in the interview, doing so would be an unenviable task. The Dark Tower has proven particularly difficult to realise on-screen, with 2017’s failed movie and an unmade Amazon TV show the most public near-misses to date.
There are at least some reasons to be hopeful though. As far as cinema goes, Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter remain unbeatable blueprints for adapting multi-book sagas, even if the most recent attempt chose instead to ape Percy Jackson. Alternatively, TV may be the more natural fit, and the form can be a very fertile environment for quality in 2020. Production values in the best shows are now at a cinematic standard. With the requisite resources (a lorry-load of cash would do), and a director as passionate as Flanagan, who’s to say a new Dark Tower couldn’t get it right?
from Movies – We Got This Covered https://ift.tt/3hUUdbV
0 comments: